pgmrdlm shares a report from ABC Information: Some hospitals are ditching the ritual of protecting reproductive organs and fetuses throughout imaging exams after outstanding medical and scientific teams have stated it is a feel-good measure that may impair the standard of diagnostic assessments and typically inadvertently enhance a affected person’s radiation publicity. The about-face is meant to enhance care, however it’s going to require a significant effort to reassure regulators, well being care employees and the general public that it is higher to not protect.
Lead shields are troublesome to place precisely, so that they usually miss the goal space they’re supposed to guard. Even when in the proper place, they will inadvertently obscure areas of the physique a physician must see — the situation of a swallowed object, say — leading to a must repeat the imaging course of, based on the American Affiliation of Physicists in Medication, which represents physicists who work in hospitals. Shields can even trigger automated publicity controls on an X-ray machine to extend radiation to all components of the physique being examined in an effort to “see by means of” the lead. Furthermore, shielding would not shield towards the best radiation impact: “scatter,” which happens when radiation ricochets contained in the physique, together with below the protect, and finally deposits its vitality in tissues. “In April, the physicists’ affiliation advisable that shielding of sufferers be ‘discontinued as routine observe,'” the report provides. “Its assertion was endorsed by a number of teams, together with the American School of Radiology and the Picture Gently Alliance, which promotes protected pediatric imaging. Nevertheless, consultants proceed to advocate that well being care employees within the imaging space shield themselves with leaded obstacles as a matter of occupational security.”
Learn extra of this story at Slashdot.